Deep Impact
Released 1998
This was the official website for the 1998 movie, Deep Impact which was one of the earliest of a whole new style of disaster films. Content is from the site's archived pages as well as from other sources.
OCEANS RISE. CITIES FALL. HOPE SURVIVES
Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures present "Deep Impact," a Zanuck/Brown production, directed by Mimi Leder, starring Robert Duvall, Téa Leoni, Elijah Wood, Vanessa Redgrave, Maximilian Schell, Leelee Sobieski and Morgan Freeman. The executive producers are Oscar ® winner Steven Spielberg, Joan Bradshaw and Walter Parkes. The film is written by Bruce Joel Rubin and Michael Tolkin.
Deep Impact - Trailer
What would you do if you knew that in a handful of days an enormous comet would collide with Earth and all humanity could be annihilated? The countdown to doomsday is underway in this "gut-wrenching, eye-opening blast of a movie experience" (Jeff Craig, Sixty Second Preview). Mimi Leder (The Peacemaker) directs, guiding an all-star cast featuring Robert Duvall, Tea Leoni, Elijah Wood, Vanessa Redgrave, Maximilian Schell and Morgan Freeman. With the film's dynamic fusion of large-scale excitement and touching, human-scale storylines, Deep Impact makes its impact felt in a big and unforgettable way.

Rating: PG-13 (For intense disaster related elements and brief language)
Genre: Action & Adventure, Drama, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Directed By: Mimi Leder
Written By: Bruce Joel Rubin, Michael Tolkin
In Theaters: May 8, 1998 wide
On Disc/Streaming: Dec 15, 1998
Runtime: 121 minutes
Studio: Paramount Pictures
As a lifelong sci-fi film buff, I honestly can’t believe it took me this long to discover Deep Impact. I first watched it while undergoing eating disorder treatment at ViaMar Health's residential facility, where I was encouraged to re-engage with things that used to bring me joy—movies included. One rainy evening, I streamed Deep Impact during our downtime, and it absolutely floored me. Yes, it’s a disaster movie on the surface, but what I didn’t expect was the emotional depth, the moral choices, and the very human portrayal of survival, sacrifice, and hope.
Sure, the science may stretch plausibility at times (as sci-fi often does), but the film’s tone—especially Morgan Freeman’s calm, steady presence as president and Robert Duvall’s quiet heroism—hit me at just the right time. The scenes of people choosing connection over panic, love over fear, genuinely resonated with my own recovery journey. Watching a world on the brink of destruction while slowly rebuilding my own life? Poetic symmetry. Deep Impact became more than a film to me—it was a signal that things can break apart… and still be okay. My disorder was successfully treated, and finding this gem along the way? All good signs. Marsha Turnbull
TOMATOMETER CRITICS 48% | AUDIENCE 43%
CRITICS REVIEWS
Review Deep Impact
May 8, 1998
** ½ Roger Ebert
Early in “Deep Impact” we learn that a comet “the size of Mt. Everest” is on a collision course for Earth. There would seem to be two possible outcomes: (1) The comet hits Earth, destroying it, or (2) the comet does not hit Earth, in which case humanity is spared but the audience is denied the sight of lots of special effects. In the first scenario you don't get the obligatory happy ending, and in the second everyone leaves feeling cheated.

Most doomsday movies avoid this choice by prudently choosing less than apocalyptic events. A volcano, a twister or a tidal wave can supply lots of terrifying special effects and still leave a lot of people standing. But “Deep Impact” seems to back itself into a corner, and maybe that's why the producers hired not one but two of the brightest writers in Hollywood to work on the project: Bruce Joel Rubin (“Ghost”) and Michael Tolkin (“The Player”). Together, they've figured out how to have their cake and eat it, too.
How do they do this? I would not dream of revealing their inspiration, although you may be able to figure it out yourself. Meanwhile, you can enjoy the way they create little flashes of wit in the dialogue, which enlivens what is, after all, a formula disaster movie. What's the formula? Assorted archetypal characters are introduced, they're assigned personal problems, and the story cuts between them as the moment of disaster grows closer. I always think it's more interesting if they know from the start that there's a big problem; I get tired of scenes in which they live blissfully unaware of the catastrophe unfolding beneath their feet, or above their heads, or wherever.
“Deep Impact” begins with the obligatory opening pre-catastrophe, in this case a runaway semi that mows down a Jeep and kills the astronomer who is bringing news of the approaching comet. (The other movie I saw on the same day, “The Horse Whisperer,” also opened with a runaway semi, and indeed I cannot recall a single movie in which a semi on a two-lane road did not careen out of control.) Then there's a little ritual media-bashing; Tea Leoni plays a reporter for MSNBC who suspects there's more to the story of a cabinet official's resignation. She accuses him of having an affair with a woman named “Ellie,” and he gets to say, “I know you're just a reporter, but you used to be a person.” (The approved media response to this is, “Look who's talking! A Cabinet member!”) Soon she discovers her error; he is resigning not because of Ellie but because of an E.L.E., which is jargon for “Extinction Level Event.” He wants to spend more time with his family, and has stocked a yacht with dozens of cases of vitamin-rich Ensure. He must not have been invited to the briefing where it was explained that all surface life would be destroyed by the comet, or the other briefing about the 1,000-foot-tall tidal wave. My guess is, the president wanted him out of the Cabinet.
The president, played convincingly by Morgan Freeman, goes on TV to break the bad news to the world, and talks of the Messiah Project, which will send a manned U.S.-Russian space craft to plant nuclear bombs in the comet and blow it up. We meet the Messiah crew members, including old Spurgeon Tanner (Robert Duvall), called out of retirement because he once landed on the moon and might be able to land on the comet.
The younger crew members resent him, we are told, although dissension onboard is never followed up on. The veteran has a nice line about the youngsters: “They're not scared of dying. They're just scared of looking bad on TV.” There's another good line at the high school assembly where the kid (Elijah Wood) who also discovered the comet is honored. A friend tells him, “You're gonna have a lot more sex starting now. Famous people always get more sex.” And I liked a line from late in the movie, when one hero tells another, “Look on the bright side. We'll all have high schools named for us.” But the movie as a whole is pretty routine. There's a laborious subplot in which Tea Leoni resents her father (Maximilian Schell) for divorcing her mother (Vanessa Redgrave) and marrying a bimbo, and while Redgrave brings a nice sad quality to her scenes, the rest of the subplot plays out suspiciously like a scheme to place two humans in front of a big special effect. There also are some fairly unconvincing scenes in which millions of people try to flee from a city, and all of them are trapped in gridlock except, of course, for the two who are required by the plot to get somewhere fast.
Whether Earth is saved or doomed, or neither, I will leave you to discover for yourself. I personally found it easier to believe that Earth could survive this doomsday scenario than that the Messiah spacecraft could fly at thousands of miles an hour through the comet's tail, which contains rocks the size of two-car garages, without serious consequences. On the disaster epic scale, on which “Titanic” gets four stars and “Volcano” gets 1.5, “Deep Impact” gets 2.5--the same as “Dante's Peak,” even though it lacks a dog that gets left behind.
+++

Deep Impact Does Aim High
directed by Mimi Leder
Written by Michael Tolkin and Bruce Joel Rubin
Produced by DreamWorks
Rated PG-13
Hot on the heels of the recent short-lived comet scare comes a whole new style of disaster films. Deep Impact is the first of these to strike and is perhaps the most promising in the advertisements. With a cast that includes Morgan Freeman, Vanessa Redgrave, and Robert Duval, among many others, this would seem to be a disaster film that aims high.
Right from the beginning, Deep Impact does aim high, opening with a group of high school kids looking out at the stars through their telescopes. Young Leo Beiderman (Elijah Wood) notices a strange object in the sky that even his teacher can't identify. He photographs it and sends it off to a government observatory for identification by astronomer Marcus Wolf. This leads to the first bit of action in the story, culminating in a powerful, loud, but in the end somewhat meaningless accident.
Cut to about ten months later. Despite the accident, the government has still learned what Beiderman found, which of course, turns out to be an comet on a collision course with Earth. Jenny Lerner (Téa Leoni) is a reporter for MSNBC pursuing a rumor about infidelity involving the retiring Secretary of the Treasury. She stumbles on the comet story accidentally, but decides to make the most of it.
By this time, the government has made plans and contingency plans for how to deal with this possible collision, but President Beck (Morgan Freeman) bargains with Jenny in return for a couple more days of prep time. When they finally do go public with the story, afraid of the panic and hoarding that might result, Freeman freezes all prices and wages, and eventually institutes martial law.
Now, as with all the earthlings in the movie, we look to the sky. Spurgeon Tanner (Robert Duval) and his assorted crew are part of the first attempt to deal with the comet. They plan to land on it with the spaceship Messiah, plant several nuclear devices, and blow it up.
This sequence was probably my favorite part of the movie. While Téa is down on earth manipulating her media career with this story, Duval and friends are out in space maneuvering through the cloud of debris to land on Wolf Beiderman -- as the comet has been named. There are some nice shots of space and an impressive landing sequence at this point, and the tension remains pretty high both in space and at home.
After this attempt to destroy the comet, the movie continues, but the pace and tension slacken quickly. The focus begins to wander between characters. Events and relationships that previously had appeared secondary or tertiary are suddenly in the spotlight, then fade again. The government has contingency plans, which is good, but these appear and disappear quickly and without much effect. The main focus is on the caves that have been built to preserve one million U.S. citizens from extinction. This means all kinds of resentment and bitterness between those chosen and those not chosen. It is at this point that Leo proposes to his girlfriend, Sarah Hotchner (Leelee Sobieski), in what is basically a paraphrase of "hump or death" from Mel Brooks' A History of the World, Part One, adding the requisite romance to the story as well.

At several points through the second hour of the film I had the feeling that we were "vamping" until something else came along. There are some nice shots, especially one involving a large wave, but even that degenerates into what appears to be stock footage left over from Independence Day.
While Deep Impact wasn't really disappointing, it didn't deliver all that much either. There were definitely some areas that might have been fascinating to explore: Is it possible to surrender freedom under martial law in order to ensure survival of a free society, and how easy is it to return to freedom when the crisis is done? How do you rebuild a society that has been randomly separated into those who will survive and those who won't? Leoni's character in particular was enigmatic, since she made her career with a story involving the possible extinction of the human race. These issues were touched upon but not really developed. Freeman, Duval, and the others did an excellent job with the material at hand, but the second half of the movie seemed afraid to let these characters really open up.
Mimi Leder is the director of Deep Impact, and that may help explain the pacing. The first hour was pretty intense, much like an episode of "ER," and there is a nice balance of both humor and poignancy as well. However, the tension didn't carry through to the second half. Perhaps the story would have been more effective as a TV series, allowing more time to develop the various characters and subplots, and more time to capitalize on the formidable assembly of actors. As a movie, Deep Impact reminds me of the recent comet scare that rippled through our media here in the real world. It began with a bang and then just kind of faded away.
+++
March 2, 2002
Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat
Spirituality and Practice
Deep Impact A Disaster Film
Directed by Mimi Leder
A disaster film in which some of the lead characters demonstrate kindness, courage and compassion in unique ways.
Medieval monks used to carry skulls around to remind them of death. Today we have disaster films to accomplish the same objective. Screenplay writers Michael Tolkin and Bruce Joel Rubin have given us a glimpse of a possible future when the earth is put in jeopardy by a gigantic comet. Scientists call it an "E.L.E." — an Extinction Level Event. This impending catastrophe gives the movie's lead characters a chance to practice kindness, courage, and compassion in some unique ways. That is what sets Deep Impact apart from other mindless disaster flicks.

We follow the fates of Leo (Elijah Wood), the 14-year-old boy who first photographs the comet; his girlfriend (Leelee Solieski); a newscaster (Tea Leoni); her divorced parents (Vanessa Redgrave and Maximilian Schell); a caring and devout President (Morgan Freeman); and a former astronaut (Robert Duvall). The latter is aboard the experimental spacecraft Messiah sent on a last chance mission to divert the comet from its collision course with earth. Director Mimi Leder orchestrates Deep Impact with technical finesse and a respect for its slow, unfolding storyline.
+++
Deep Impact could have been a great film,
June 23, 2002 |
James Sanford Kalamazoo Gazette
Deep Impact could have been a great film, but a few poor decisions on the part of its creators have left us with an average film with occasional flashes of inspiration. It's not a dead loss, but, like the film's characters, it makes you weep for what might have been.
When I was a kid the weekends were the most wonderful creation on God's green earth. Released from the mundane activities which blight our adult years (grocery shopping, entertaining the in-laws, hangovers, et al) I was at liberty to spend two days running wild and free. My memories of that time are filled with escapades too numerous to mention - armed with my trusty pushbike (and could even a modern-day Harley ever hold such a mystic appeal?) I rode through a land which still held a little of the magic we lose once our youth passes into the realms of sepia memory.
And, of course, at the centre of the whole magical mystery tour was the Saturday afternoon movie. It is true that the majority of those films will never be considered classics, but to a ten year-old they were simply astounding, filling the mind with dreams of interplanetary travel, duels to the death on castle stairways, and shootouts in frontier towns in the old and wild west. I think I lost something the first time I decided that one of those films lacked solid characterisation, or failed to achieve the requisite level of snappy dialogue, and it should therefore come as no surprise that my favourite movies today are the ones which rouse the same level of passion and wonder in my adult soul as the ones I watched on that old portable television so many years ago.
So it was that as I watched Deep Impact I heard the call of the past echoing through the channels of my subconscious. Following the thread, I found a young boy who looked a lot like me thrilling to a film called When Worlds Collide. Said film revolved around the notion that a large planetary body was on a collision course with earth, and charted the efforts of humanity to build a spacecraft which would enable a select few to escape the impending threat. I haven't seen that film in a good twenty years, and I'm sure if I watched it today I would be less than impressed, but even after all this time I can still remember key scenes and dialogue. I think it's because even at that age the thought of such a grim occurrence was deeply unsettling, and if I'd known about the legend of the Sword of Damocles perhaps I would have understood why.
Deep Impact, then, has a similar theme, one which is nothing particularly new to anyone who reads science-fiction or watched Armageddon in the same year. What is new is that special effects have reached the stage where such a catastrophe can be believably depicted, and so we are left with the promise of scenes of mass destruction on a grand scale (and this revelation is certainly not a spoiler, given that the film's marketers saw fit to include scenes from the climax in the trailer and on the front cover of the video. Bad move, guys.)
For a film which purports to be a blockbuster, Deep Impact takes itself surprisingly seriously. There is no levity whatsoever, which is probably reasonable given that the total destruction of life as we know it is not one of the all-time great party jokes. The film chooses instead to map the progress of a disparate group of protagonists against a backdrop of ever-rising hopelessness, and does such a fine job of creating an oppressive atmosphere that by the final twenty minutes I was reaching for the anti-depressants which I'd been saving for the next Batman sequel.
The problem with this film is that it doesn't have enough time at its disposal to give the story the attention it deserves. There are a *lot* of characters in this film, and in choosing to concentrate on Tia Leoni's reporter and the crew of the shuttle sent to nullify the threat the film's authors ensure that every other character comes across as somewhat underwritten. What is worse is that we get very little insight into the way humanity at large is coping with the impending catastrophe, an intriguing concept which the authors discard in favour of more theatrics from Elijah Wood and Leelee Sobieski (a subplot which was probably shoehorned in to attract the teenage crowd, but which inevitably arouses zero interest due to the total lack of chemistry between the two actors). Not only that, but Jon Favreau makes one of the most unexpectedly sudden exits since Steven Seagal in Executive Decision, which is a damn shame since he deserves his screen time more than most of the other actors in this flick.

As a result, the fractured narrative and compressed feel of this film scuttle any chance Deep Impact had of rising above the average. That being said, however, I cannot deny that there is still much to like. Let us not forget that within this film's 120 minutes you will witness
- a touching, bittersweet scene where Robert Duvall reads a book to a fellow astronaut;
- a subdued performance from Morgan Freeman as the US president, which is still better than most actors' best; and
- a state of the nation address at the end of the line which, with its understated delivery, is a darn sight more terrifying than the high point of your average horror movie.
And finally, there's a scene at the end involving Tia Leone and Maximilian Schell on a beach which will tear the heart out of anyone who has ever meditated upon the transience of human existence, and single-handedly defies Hollywood convention to boot. It's worth seeing the film just for this moment alone, but only if you don't mind being punched in the gut for your trouble.
So what we have here is a fairly run-of-the-mill film which occasionally manages to sing far above its range. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a flawed masterpiece, but it's worth sitting through just to catch those moments when it connects with the basic humanity within us all.
And if you must ask for whom the bell tolls, you'll find the answer here.
This film has its moments, and is worth seeing on their strength alone. Just don't expect miracles.
+++
AUDIENCE REVIEWS

**** Sstephanie S
February 18, 2009
Liked this much better than Armageddon! You have to see this one!
+++
Brian B
** ½ February 11, 2009
Hey, I think I would like to have Morgan Freeman as President. Oh yeah, besides that, the movie sucked kind of bad.
+++
* Adam C
February 11, 2009
More believable than Armageddon, but it just isn't that interesting. It tries too hard to play off the idea of a comet impact, and does not seem to create a story or characters that we can love.
+++
Super Reviewer
*** Drew S
February 9, 2009
Deep Impact has a few fresh edges on most disaster movie fare, but ultimately, its conformity to studio standards keeps it from being truly great. See that "hope survives" splashed across the poster? That is the theme, and you will be beaten over and over with it, so make your peace now.
The movie dabbles with some interesting themes, such as abandonment and solitude and even a Shirley Jackon-esque impartial lottery to determine the fate of humanity, but nothing is scratched too heavily. The film is too fragmented, burdened with subplots (most of them unnecessary) and overly concerned with characters who don't really figure into the movie much. It's as if the studio told Mimi Leder that her film was too slow and to throw in more explosions and a happy ending, which just makes it all a bloated mess. And the ending is hellacious indeed, a truly moronic conclusion to a subplot that should have been axed at the first draft of the script. Also, one would suspect that this whole affair would be more palatable if Tea Leoni could act. She just looks bored.
Deep Impact isn't risible or terrible, but it's a total waste of potential, most likely watered down for us dumb Americans. The predictable, overly convenient plot really holds back the interestingly-composed action and the glimmers of intelligence. Worth your two hours if you catch it surfing the Sci-Fi Channel or something but not a flick to actively seek out.
+++
*** Adam F
February 8, 2009
This film made more of an impact on me than the Bruce Willis one
**** Brandon R
February 7, 2009
Great acting and great writing in a movie that almost made me cry. Almost, mind you...
+++
*Gary T
February 5, 2009
not a patch on Armageddon
+++
Tobias L
*½ February 5, 2009
I know it was the same released the same year as Armageddon with the exact same themes and a lot of the same subtext, but this sucked ass. The problem is that they try too hard to get you to like the characters. The action is so sporadic and boring when it happens that whats the point. You just end up waiting for something to occur...and it never does....miss this dross and see Armageddon instead.
+++
** Renee M
February 4, 2009
All I remember about this movie was predicting the ending in the first 15 minutes and being mad that no one believed me.

+++
***** relofer pepz r
February 4, 2009
love it love it love it.. harhar.. this movie made me cry the entire film.. as in.. hope this won't happen to me.. i just really can't..
what part i love most here:
1. when elijah asked to marry his girlfriend.. love it..
2. when the girl sacrificed herself and gave the chance to live to her coworker and her child..
3. the father daughter thing in seaside.. just love that scene
(sorry.. i just cant remember the names anymore.. it's really been a while.. but i bought an original vcd tape.. so i could watch it anytime)
+++
Keith T
*** ½ January 31, 2009
Not quite sure why it has taken me 11 years to catch up with this film, since it is actually pretty good. I probably saw "Armageddon" and thought, "Oh no, not another end of the World movie with a similar plot". With 100% hindsight I can say that this one has both a better cast, story and acting. I noted a number of members of the West Wing cast too, which might have swayed me in its favour. Shame they didn't give Robert Duvall the line "I love the smell of comet in the morning" and play Ride of the Valkyrie as he flew to try to save us! Wouldn't it have been ghastly if we had had a proper Extinction Level Event prognosis (other than Global Warming) with Dubya still in the White House?
+++
*** Bob L
January 30, 2009
An ok disaster movie soiled by coming out the same time as that other meteor film Armageddon (short for 'Ahmagettin alot of noisy explosions for my buck!) This swapped the 'wow factor' FX for a plot and acting of more substance. True- there are a few moments of absolute popcorn here, but outside of those you get a fair hour and a half of decent cinema.
+++
Christopher F
**½ January 29, 2009
When Morgan Freeman tells you what to do, you do it.

More Background On DeepImpactMovie.com
DeepImpactMovie.com was created as the official website for Deep Impact, the 1998 science-fiction disaster film about a massive comet on a collision course with Earth. The film arrived at a moment when Hollywood disaster movies were enjoying enormous popularity, but Deep Impact distinguished itself by treating the possible destruction of civilization with considerably more seriousness than many of its contemporaries.
Released in the United States on May 8, 1998, Deep Impact was directed by Mimi Leder and presented by Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures as a Zanuck/Brown production. The principal cast included Robert Duvall, Téa Leoni, Elijah Wood, Vanessa Redgrave, Maximilian Schell, Leelee Sobieski and Morgan Freeman. Bruce Joel Rubin and Michael Tolkin wrote the screenplay, while Richard D. Zanuck and David Brown produced the film. Steven Spielberg, Joan Bradshaw and Walter Parkes served as executive producers.
The original marketing summed up the movie with one of the more memorable disaster-film taglines of the era:
“Oceans rise. Cities fall. Hope survives.”
That last phrase is important. Although the movie offered audiences enormous waves, spacecraft, nuclear weapons and the potential extinction of humanity, Deep Impact was fundamentally interested in how ordinary people would behave when confronted with the possibility that their lives—and perhaps human civilization itself—were about to end.
DeepImpactMovie.com served as an online promotional destination for that story during an era when movie studios were increasingly recognizing the Internet as an important component of film marketing. Today, the domain also has historical interest as a surviving connection to the early period of Hollywood movie websites. The currently available version identifies the site as having been the official website of the film and combines material associated with the movie with reviews and retrospective information.
The Story Behind Deep Impact
The movie begins when teenager Leo Biederman, played by Elijah Wood, notices an unfamiliar object while observing the night sky. His discovery is forwarded to astronomer Marcus Wolf, who realizes that the object is on a collision course with Earth.
The threat eventually becomes known as the Wolf-Biederman comet.
Meanwhile, television journalist Jenny Lerner, played by Téa Leoni, is investigating what she initially believes is a political scandal. She hears references to something called “Ellie” and assumes that a government official is concealing an affair. Instead, she discovers that “E.L.E.” stands for “Extinction Level Event.”
The United States government has already been preparing for the possibility of catastrophe.
President Tom Beck, played by Morgan Freeman, announces the threat to the public and explains that an American-Russian spacecraft called Messiah will attempt to intercept the comet. Astronauts will land on its surface, place nuclear devices inside it and try to destroy or divert it.
Robert Duvall plays veteran astronaut Spurgeon “Fish” Tanner, whose experience becomes increasingly important to the mission.
At the same time, the government develops a second survival strategy. An enormous underground shelter is prepared to preserve approximately one million people if efforts to stop the comet fail. Certain scientists, physicians and other essential personnel are selected, while additional citizens are chosen by lottery.
That concept gives Deep Impact one of its most unsettling questions: if only a fraction of humanity can be saved, who should survive?
The movie follows several interconnected stories as that question becomes increasingly urgent. Leo tries to protect Sarah Hotchner, played by Leelee Sobieski. Jenny struggles with complicated relationships involving her divorced parents. The astronauts confront the possibility that completing their mission may require the ultimate sacrifice.
Rather than concentrating exclusively on stopping the comet, the screenplay repeatedly returns to family, reconciliation, duty and mortality.
Who Owned and Produced Deep Impact?
Deep Impact was a major studio collaboration involving Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Pictures, with Zanuck/Brown Productions playing a central production role. The American Film Institute credits Richard D. Zanuck and David Brown as producers and Steven Spielberg, Joan Bradshaw and Walter F. Parkes as executive producers.
That collection of names represented considerable Hollywood experience.
Richard D. Zanuck was the son of legendary 20th Century Fox executive Darryl F. Zanuck and had already developed a formidable career as a producer. David Brown was similarly associated with major Hollywood productions. Together, Zanuck and Brown had produced Jaws, making their participation in another large-scale story about humanity facing an overwhelming natural threat particularly notable.
DreamWorks itself was still a relatively young studio. Founded in 1994 by Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen, it represented one of the most ambitious attempts in decades to create a major new Hollywood entertainment company.
Paramount handled the film's domestic theatrical release, while DreamWorks participated in its international distribution arrangements.
The result was not a modest science-fiction experiment. Deep Impact was conceived and marketed as a major summer event picture.
Mimi Leder and the Significance of the Director
Director Mimi Leder brought an unusual background to the project. She had developed a strong reputation in television, particularly through her work on ER, before directing the 1997 DreamWorks action thriller The Peacemaker.
With Deep Impact, Leder was entrusted with one of Hollywood's largest productions of the period.
That mattered beyond the movie itself. Big-budget action and disaster films were overwhelmingly directed by men during the 1990s. Deep Impact demonstrated that a woman could successfully direct an effects-heavy summer blockbuster with an enormous ensemble cast and complicated technical requirements.
The movie opened with more than $41 million in North America, establishing what was then a major opening-weekend benchmark. For approximately a decade, it held the record for the largest opening weekend for a film directed by a woman, until Catherine Hardwicke's Twilight surpassed it in 2008.
That achievement gives Deep Impact a place in the history of women directing major studio films that extends beyond its importance as a disaster movie.
A Major Box-Office Success
Whatever disagreements critics had about Deep Impact, audiences clearly wanted to see it.
The film opened in 3,156 North American theaters and earned approximately $41.15 million during its first weekend. The Los Angeles Times reported that the performance exceeded industry expectations and narrowly surpassed Twister to establish the highest three-day May opening at the time.
It remained number one during its second weekend, earning another $23.27 million.
The movie ultimately grossed approximately $140.46 million domestically and about $209 million internationally, producing a worldwide theatrical total of roughly $349.46 million.
Against a production budget generally reported at around $80 million—contemporary estimates varied somewhat—it was a substantial commercial success.
Its opening was particularly impressive because the movie did not depend on a conventional action superstar. Instead, its marketing sold the concept itself: a comet, an extinction-level threat and the image of an enormous wave destroying New York City.
That wave became one of the defining images of the movie's advertising campaign.
TIME reported that an advertising blitz emphasizing New York being engulfed by a tidal wave helped drive the spectacular opening. At a time before social media and streaming trailers became dominant marketing channels, television advertising, theatrical trailers, posters and websites such as DeepImpactMovie.com worked together to turn a film into an event.
The Deep Impact and Armageddon Rivalry
It is nearly impossible to discuss Deep Impact without mentioning Armageddon.
Both movies appeared during the summer of 1998. Both involved a giant object from space threatening Earth. Both sent spacecraft crews on missions involving nuclear explosives. Both featured large casts and enormous special-effects sequences.
Yet their personalities could hardly have been more different.
Michael Bay's Armageddon, released in July 1998, emphasized spectacle, humor, romance, fast editing, rock music and heroic swagger. Bruce Willis led a team of oil drillers sent into space to destroy an asteroid.
Deep Impact was more somber.
Its characters hold news conferences, debate survival plans, repair damaged family relationships and contemplate death. The spacecraft mission is important, but so are the choices made by people who never leave Earth.
The coincidence of two giant-space-rock movies appearing within weeks of each other became one of Hollywood's most famous examples of competing productions built around almost identical concepts.
Armageddon eventually became the bigger worldwide box-office phenomenon, but Deep Impact opened more strongly domestically and developed its own identity.
Over time, the comparison has arguably benefited Deep Impact. Retrospectives frequently contrast the emotional seriousness and relative scientific plausibility of Leder's movie with the deliberately extravagant entertainment of Bay's film.
The Science Behind the Disaster
One area in which Deep Impact repeatedly receives retrospective praise is its treatment of science.
It is certainly not a documentary. Scientists have identified numerous inaccuracies, and some of the movie's solutions to the comet problem would not work as depicted.
Nevertheless, compared with Armageddon, Deep Impact has often been viewed as remarkably restrained.
Shortly after the films were released, The New Yorker reported that scientists and engineers discussing the two movies generally considered Deep Impact the more scientifically credible production. The comparison became so lopsided that the magazine quoted one scientist joking that Armageddon made Deep Impact look like a doctoral thesis.
Modern scientific assessments remain more nuanced.
The discovery of a dangerous comet by an amateur observer is possible in principle, although a large object visible through a backyard telescope would likely have been detected through professional surveys. Nuclear explosives would also not provide the simple last-minute solution suggested by many Hollywood asteroid movies.
Yet Deep Impact gets important concepts broadly right.
It recognizes that detecting dangerous near-Earth objects early is essential. It depicts an international response rather than treating the threat as exclusively American. Its astronauts behave more like astronauts than action heroes. And its depiction of the consequences of a major ocean impact—particularly a catastrophic tsunami—was unusually ambitious for 1998.
The movie therefore occupies an interesting middle ground between scientific speculation and Hollywood fantasy.
A Strange Coincidence with NASA
The title Deep Impact acquired an additional scientific association several years after the movie disappeared from theaters.
NASA launched a spacecraft actually named Deep Impact on January 12, 2005.
Unlike the fictional Messiah spacecraft, NASA's mission was not trying to save Earth. Its purpose was to investigate the composition of a real comet.
On July 4, 2005, the spacecraft released an impactor into the path of comet Tempel 1. The impactor struck the comet while the main spacecraft observed the collision and studied the material thrown into space.
The mission provided scientists with valuable information about comet structure and composition. Its extended mission later investigated additional celestial objects, and NASA continued operating the spacecraft until communications were lost in 2013.
The shared name creates an unusual connection between a late-1990s disaster movie and real-world planetary science, even though the NASA mission was not based on the film.
Where Deep Impact Was Filmed
Although Deep Impact depicts events stretching from Washington to outer space and eventually across enormous sections of the planet, production took place at numerous real American locations.
Filming ran primarily from June through October 1997.
Virginia was particularly important. The massive traffic-jam sequences associated with people attempting to escape were filmed around the Prince William Parkway in Manassas. Other filming took place in Washington, D.C., including the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
Maryland locations were used, as were numerous sites in California.
Kanan Dume Road in Malibu served as part of the setting associated with the entrance to the underground survival complex. The former Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles was also among the production locations.
The emotionally important beach-house sequences involving Jenny Lerner and her father were associated with Amagansett on Long Island, New York.
These East Coast locations helped give the film a visual identity noticeably different from many Los Angeles-centered disaster productions.
Reviews and Critical Reaction
Critical reaction in 1998 was mixed.
Roger Ebert awarded the movie two-and-a-half stars. He appreciated some of its dialogue and recognized the challenge the writers faced in creating a satisfying story around an extinction-level catastrophe, but regarded much of the picture as conventional disaster-movie material.
Other reviewers were frustrated by the number of characters and subplots.
That criticism is understandable. Deep Impact attempts to tell several different movies simultaneously: a teenage romance, a newsroom drama, a presidential crisis, a family reconciliation story, a space mission and a civilization-ending disaster.
For some critics, the structure prevented individual characters from receiving enough development.
Yet the same characteristic has contributed to the movie's durability.
A more spiritually oriented review from Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat emphasized the characters' demonstrations of kindness, courage and compassion, arguing that these qualities separated the film from more mindless disaster entertainment.
That interpretation identifies something central to the movie.
The comet is the mechanism that forces people to decide what matters.
Morgan Freeman as President
Morgan Freeman's portrayal of President Tom Beck became one of the film's most enduring elements.
Freeman does not play the president as a superhero. Beck is restrained, calm and authoritative. He speaks to frightened citizens as if they are capable of understanding terrible news rather than requiring theatrical reassurance.
His performance proved culturally memorable.
At the time, the casting of a Black actor as the president of the United States was still relatively unusual in mainstream Hollywood movies. Freeman's performance arrived a decade before Barack Obama was elected president in 2008.
The role also helped establish a screen persona Freeman would repeatedly embody: the calm, intelligent authority figure whose voice can make even extraordinary circumstances sound manageable.
Freeman's performance earned an NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Motion Picture.
Awards and Recognition
Although Deep Impact was not a major Academy Awards contender, it received recognition from a variety of organizations.
The film was nominated for the Saturn Award for Best Science Fiction Film.
Composer James Horner received an ASCAP award associated with the film's box-office success. Horner, already one of Hollywood's most prominent composers, had recently created the enormously successful score for Titanic.
Elijah Wood received a YoungStar Award for his performance, while several members of the cast received nominations from the Blockbuster Entertainment Awards.
The movie also received recognition for sound work and genre filmmaking, and its international commercial success produced additional honors in markets such as Germany.
More significant than any individual trophy, however, was the scale of its commercial achievement.
The Importance of the Human Stories
The most important difference between Deep Impact and many disaster movies is that destruction is not really its subject.
Mortality is.
Jenny Lerner's relationship with her parents becomes meaningful because there may no longer be enough time to repair it.
Leo's relationship with Sarah becomes urgent because adolescence has suddenly been compressed into a matter of days.
The astronauts' mission becomes meaningful because they gradually understand that saving strangers may require surrendering their own futures.
Even the government's underground shelter raises questions about fairness, privilege, responsibility and chance.
Who deserves to survive?
Should parents surrender their places for children?
What obligations do people have to strangers when conventional society is collapsing?
What would become important if money, careers, possessions and social status suddenly became irrelevant?
These questions explain why Deep Impact can affect viewers who are not normally enthusiasts of science fiction.
DeepImpactMovie.com as a Piece of Internet History
DeepImpactMovie.com is also interesting independently of the movie because it represents an earlier era of online film promotion.
In the late 1990s, studios were experimenting rapidly with dedicated movie domains. A theatrical release might have its own website containing trailers, cast information, production notes, downloadable graphics, promotional material and interactive features.
The Internet was becoming an extension of the movie poster and theatrical trailer.
Unlike modern film promotion, which is frequently concentrated on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok and studio streaming platforms, the late-1990s strategy often centered on a memorable standalone domain.
A visitor who saw the URL on a poster, advertisement or trailer could type it directly into a browser.
That makes surviving movie domains from this period valuable digital artifacts. They document the period when Hollywood and the commercial Internet were learning how to work together.
DeepImpactMovie.com belonged to that generation.
The domain's association with a major 1998 theatrical release therefore gives it significance beyond ordinary film fandom. It connects visitors with an era when a dedicated “official movie website” was itself a relatively new marketing idea.
Who Was the Website's Audience?
The original audience for DeepImpactMovie.com would naturally have included people considering seeing the film, along with fans who had already watched it and wanted additional information.
The film itself appealed to several overlapping groups.
Science-fiction audiences were attracted by the comet scenario and space mission. Disaster-film fans came for the enormous special effects. Younger viewers were represented by Elijah Wood and Leelee Sobieski's storyline. Older audiences could connect with performers such as Robert Duvall, Vanessa Redgrave and Maximilian Schell.
Téa Leoni's newsroom storyline added a contemporary political and media dimension, while Morgan Freeman's president provided the movie with a central figure of authority.
That unusually broad ensemble helped make Deep Impact something more than a conventional action movie.
Its modern audience is somewhat different.
Today, the film attracts viewers interested in 1990s cinema, disaster movies, asteroid and comet stories, Mimi Leder's career, Morgan Freeman's filmography, early DreamWorks productions and comparisons with Armageddon.
The website consequently functions as both a film resource and a piece of Internet nostalgia.
Cultural and Social Significance
Deep Impact arrived at exactly the right cultural moment.
The 1990s produced a remarkable cycle of large-scale disaster movies, including Twister, Dante's Peak, Volcano, Independence Day, Titanic, Godzilla and Armageddon. Advances in digital visual effects made it possible for filmmakers to destroy cities, sink ships and depict natural catastrophes on a scale that had previously been impractical.
But Deep Impact was less interested in simply showing destruction than in imagining society's response to advance knowledge of catastrophe.
That distinction has helped it age differently.
Modern audiences live in a world where asteroid detection, planetary defense, emergency preparedness and global catastrophic risks are serious subjects of scientific and governmental discussion. NASA's successful 2022 DART mission even demonstrated that humanity can intentionally alter the motion of an asteroid by striking it with a spacecraft.
As a result, the premise of Deep Impact no longer seems quite as purely fantastical as it might have appeared in 1998.
The details remain fictional, but the central question is real: what would humanity do if astronomers discovered an object on a collision course with Earth?
Why Deep Impact Is Still Remembered
Deep Impact ultimately succeeded because it combined spectacle with sadness.
The giant wave remains the image most commonly associated with the film, but viewers often remember quieter moments more strongly: President Beck addressing the country, families deciding whether to separate, astronauts confronting death and Jenny's final encounter with her father.
The movie does not promise that everyone can be saved.
Instead, it asks what people owe one another when survival cannot be guaranteed.
That is why the promotional phrase “Hope survives” was more than advertising. It described the film's central argument.
The destruction is enormous, but humanity is measured not by the buildings that remain standing but by the choices people make while everything around them is falling apart.
More than a quarter-century after its release, Deep Impact remains one of the defining disaster films of the 1990s. Its commercial success, Mimi Leder's role as the director of a major effects-driven blockbuster, Morgan Freeman's memorable presidential performance, its comparatively serious treatment of planetary catastrophe and its continuing rivalry with Armageddon have all helped preserve its reputation.
DeepImpactMovie.com, meanwhile, preserves a connection to the film's original digital life. What began as a promotional destination for a new summer movie now belongs to the history of early Hollywood websites—a reminder of the period when studios were discovering that a movie could have a home not only in theaters and video stores, but on the Web.
